Table of contents
- Unbiased Basic Supplements Whey Review
- 🔑 Basic Supplements Whey Review, TL;DR
- 🛡️ How I Approach This Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review
- 📖 Basic Supplements Whey Review Details
- 🔑 Where Should I Buy Basic Supplements Online, TL;DR
- 🔑 Amino Spiking in Basic Supplements Whey: Inflated Numbers or Intact Protein? TL;DR
- 🔑 Is Basic Supplements Whey Third-Party Tested? TL;DR
- 🔑 Protein Powder Comparison: Basic Supplements, TL;DR
- 🥤 What’s The Best Way To Mix Basic Supplements Protein Powder
- 👌 Does Basic Supplements Blue Marshmallow Taste Good?
- 🔑 Basic Supplements Whey Protein Ingredients List, TL;DR
- 🔑 Basic Supplements Whey: Supplement Facts, Macros, and Label Red Flags, TL;DR
- 📋 Basic Supplements FAQ
- 🏁 Basic Supplements Whey Review – Final Thoughts
- 🧐 Basic Supplements Whey Review Round-Up
- 📑 Basic Supplements Whey Review Sources
Unbiased Basic Supplements Whey Review
Marketed as a premium protein at a mid-tier price, this Basic Supplements Whey Review explains why the product doesn’t live up to either claim. There’s more marketing than muscle here, from missing PDCAAS and %DV to vague amino numbers and no certified testing. You’ll learn why Provon and Avonlac don’t automatically mean quality—and how this brand skips the hard proof. If transparency matters, this Basic Supplements Whey Review might change your mind.
What You’re Really Getting with Basic Supplements Whey (Hint: It’s Not Premium Protein)
Summary
You might think this Blue Marshmallow tub screams quality, but dig past the label, and the Basic Supplements Review tells a different story. It’s pitched as high-end whey using Provon and Avonlac, but skips key disclosures like %DV, PDCAAS, and amino validation. Flavor? Cotton candy nostalgia. But transparency? Missing. With “Natural u0026amp; Artificial Flavors” listed second and a Prop 65 warning slapped on the side, this isn’t built for serious lifters but for label aesthetics. If you’re chasing results, not rainbow sprinkles, look elsewhere.
Pros
- Fun novelty flavor
Cons
- Proprietary protein blend
- Possible amino spiking
- Prop 65 warning present
- Poor customer support
Basic Supplements Protein Concentrate Review: watch the in-depth video version of this review.
🔑 Basic Supplements Whey Review, TL;DR
This isn’t premium protein—it’s branding in a blue tub. Here’s what the final Basic Supplements Whey Protein review uncovers:
There is no PDCAAS, %DV, or amino Acid Verification. Basic Supplements Protein claims 25g of protein and a full amino acid profile, but it skips digestibility scores, omits %DV, and never backs its numbers with a third-party CoA. The label leans on Glanbia’s Provon and Avonlac for credibility but fails to disclose what percentage of each is used.
Amino Spiking Red Flags All Over the Panel. “Natural & Artificial Flavors” are listed second by weight, well ahead of salt or sucralose. That’s not just about taste. Under FDA regulation 21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i), nitrogen-rich aminos like glutamine and glycine can legally inflate protein numbers while doing nothing for muscle growth. The result? 25g on the label, but no verified protein integrity.
Transparency? Just Marketing. They claim “We don’t cut corners” and brag about “quality without compromise” on their Our Story page—but there’s no NSF, no Informed Protein, and no clear contact for toxicology or amino reports. Even the Prop 65 warning is buried.
Customer Service is Nonexistent. There is no phone number, no response to direct messages, and a 30-day return window only applies if the tub is unopened. That’s not forward-thinking—that’s friction.
Final Score: 16.5 out of 50 – 33% – Fails to Deliver. Basic Supplements Whey Protein is the illusion of quality, not the proof of it.
🛡️ How I Approach This Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review
🌟 As a certified strength and conditioning expert (NSCA) and nutrition specialist (CISSN), I wrote this Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review to cut through marketing fluff and get to the facts. If the label’s hiding something, I’ll find it—and if the protein holds up, I’ll give it credit.
👥 This Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review wasn’t sponsored or brand-fed. Whether it came from personal interest or a YouTube request, my reviews are based on real testing—no recycled claims, no influencer fluff.
🔍 Transparency is the baseline. In this Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review, I examine the sourcing, labeling, and whether the protein delivers its promises. I’ll also note if there’s a Prop 65 warning, suspicious amino profile, or missing third-party testing.
📖 This Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review covers more than just flavor and macros. I break down the ingredient integrity, protein content, and how the brand compares to industry leaders. You’ll know exactly what you’re getting—and what you’re not.
💼 My goal is to make this Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review useful, honest, and clear. After reading, you’ll know if it deserves a spot in your stack—or if it’s just another underdosed blend wrapped in good branding.
📖 Basic Supplements Whey Review Details

This Basic Supplements Whey Protein review doesn’t read like a brand fairytale. It’s a full breakdown of the Blue Marshmallow flavor—claims, ingredients, and whether Basic Supplements Protein lives up to the “premium” pitch plastered all over their own Our Story page. They boldly claim, “We don’t cut corners” and “transparency builds trust.” But when you open the label, that transparency looks more like marketing fog than hard facts.
You’ll learn exactly how Basic Supplements leans on Provon and Avonlac—Glanbia’s proprietary proteins—as their quality flex. The brand flaunts cross-flow microfiltration, “no chemicals or extreme temperatures,” and says their dairy proteins “maintain the full spectrum of amino acids naturally found in whey.” But what don’t they disclose? The actual percentage of Provon and Avonlac per scoop. Or a PDCAAS score. Or even %DV for protein. And despite mentioning third-party labs, there’s no Informed Protein or NSF for Sport certification on the tub.
This review breaks all of that down, line by line.
We also cover the Prop 65 warning, how “Natural & Artificial Flavors” are listed second by weight, and how that opens the door to legal amino spiking through nitrogen-rich amino acids like glycine and glutamine, which boost label protein without supporting muscle growth.
So, is Basic Supplements Whey Protein worth it? Maybe if you’re into novelty flavors and don’t mind the smoke and mirrors. But if you care about muscle-building integrity, third-party verification, and real label transparency? Then this isn’t the “no BS” product they claim it is.
🔑 Where Should I Buy Basic Supplements Online, TL;DR
If you’re grabbing Basic Supplements Whey Protein, Amazon is the smarter play—same $39.99 price, free 2-day shipping for Prime members, and zero hassle. Buying direct from the brand? Expect to cough up $17.44 for shipping unless you spend $100, and even then, returns only apply to unopened tubs with proof of purchase (Basic Supplements Refund Policy). Either way, you’re getting the same flashy label, the same blue marshmallow clumps, and the same flavor-loaded scoop with transparency concerns baked in. The bottom line is to buy where you’ll regret it less.
🛒 Where Should I Buy Basic Supplements Online
Full disclosure—I bought my Basic Supplements Whey Protein tub directly from Amazon. Why? Because I’m not paying nearly $20 just to get the thing shipped from their official site. That’s right: Basic Supplements charges $17.44 for standard shipping unless you hit $100+ in orders (Basic Supplements Shipping Policy). If you’re an Amazon Prime member, skip the nonsense and get 2-day free shipping.
| Where To Buy Basic Supplements | ||
| Retailer | Basic Supplements | Amazon |
| Shipping & Handling | Free S&H on orders $100+Standard Fee: $17.44 | Prime Members get free 2-day shipping |
| Subscription Savings | No S&S | No S&S |
| Money-Back Guarantee | 30 days from purchase, unopened | No returns on supplements |
| Payment Options | Standard payment options and ShopPay | Standard payment options |
| Price | $39.99 per container (27 servings) | $39.99 per container (27 servings) |
| Price per Serving | $1.48 per serving | $1.48 per serving |
Now, if you’re the type who loves hunting down niche supplement brands at boutique retailers or random gym shops, knock yourself out. Maybe you’ll find Basics Protein Powder locally, but don’t expect broad retail availability. Also, while the brand offers a money-back guarantee if you buy directly from them (unopened only), Amazon doesn’t accept returns on supplements. So, do you hate the flavor, or does it arrive clumpy? You’re stuck with it either way.
The bottom line is that Amazon is your best bet if you’re trying to test out Basic Supplements Protein without paying a premium just for shipping. But whether you buy it from the brand or Bezos, don’t expect premium support. Just be sure you’re cool with the gamble.
💸 Does Basic Supplements Have A Money-Back Guarantee?
Technically, yes—but don’t expect open arms and a no-questions-asked return process. Basic Supplements Whey Protein is eligible for a refund, but only if the product is unopened, in original condition, and returned within 30 days of purchase. The catch? You must contact the company first for approval, or your return will be denied outright. Basic Supplements Refund Policy makes this clear: “Items returned without first contacting us will not be accepted.”
Oh, and if you’re looking for their customer service email? It’s not on the front page, FAQ, container, or contact tab. It’s buried at the bottom of the refund policy: info@basicsupplements.com. Real forward-thinking strategy, make it inconvenient for customers to get a refund for a clumpy, flavor-heavy tub of Basics Protein Powder.
Bottom line: Basic Supplements does offer a money-back guarantee, but only if you haven’t opened the tub, contacted them first, and still have your proof of purchase.
Value: 1 of 10.
Basic Supplements are marketing perceptions, not product values. They slap on Glanbia’s name, talk up Avonlac and Provon, and toss around words like “premium” and “science-backed”—but never share ratios, PDCAAS, or even amino testing. You’re paying mid-tier pricing for a scoop with a Prop 65 warning, buried contact info, and zero customer response when asked for clarification. That’s not value—it’s branding over substance.
🔑 Amino Spiking in Basic Supplements Whey: Inflated Numbers or Intact Protein? TL;DR
Basic Supplements Whey Protein claims 25g of protein per scoop with 2.5g leucine—but under FDA law (21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i)), nitrogen from cheap aminos like glycine can legally count toward that total. That’s the loophole. And when “Natural and Artificial Flavors” show up second by weight, higher than salt or sweeteners, you’re left wondering how much of that protein is high-quality, muscle-building whey. Without PDCAAS scores, amino acid verification, or Informed Protein certification, there’s no way to confirm the anabolic potential of Basics Protein Powder. So if you’re chasing real muscle growth, don’t trust the scoop—verify it.
⚛️ Amino Spiking in Basic Supplements Whey: Inflated Numbers or Intact Protein?
Let’s cut through the marketing gloss. Basic Supplements Whey Protein claims 25g of protein and prints an amino acid profile on the label. But that doesn’t mean you’re getting 25g of usable protein. Under FDA regulations (21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i)), companies can legally count any nitrogen-based compound as protein—whether it’s intact whey, glutamine, or filler glycine.
That’s the loophole. And Basic Protein Powder walks right through it.
Later in this review, we’ll dive deeper into how “Natural and Artificial Flavors” are listed second by weight, well ahead of salt and sweeteners. That’s not just about taste. Amino acids like glycine and glutamine, both nitrogen-rich, can be blended into flavoring systems and still register as “protein” on a nitrogen test, even though they don’t support muscle protein synthesis (MPS) the same way intact whey does.
An academic review published in Nutrients explains that “amino acids such as glycine or taurine… can inflate protein content when measured by nitrogen analysis, but they do not contribute significantly to muscle protein synthesis” (Keller et al., 2020).
And let’s just say this now: the brand name drops Provon and Avonlac and claims 25g of protein, but without PDCAAS scores, a third-party amino profile, or clear ratio disclosures, Basics Protein Powder leaves too much to guess. This might be labeled as protein, but how much of it is muscle-building, high-quality whey?
In the next section, we’ll answer that and revisit the third-party testing claims, discussing how many scoops are needed to build muscle.

💪 After Training Shake: How Many Scoops of Basic Supplements Whey Protein To Build Muscle
Let’s not overcomplicate this: for muscle protein synthesis (MPS) to kick in after training, you need at least 2.5 to 3.0g of leucine, and around 25g of high-quality protein. Basics Protein Powder claims to deliver 25g of protein with 2.523g of leucine per scoop. That’s technically within striking distance—but only if you believe the numbers on the label.
And here’s the problem: I don’t.
Basic Supplements Whey is riddled with transparency issues—no PDCAAS testing, no %DV for protein, and a Prop 65 warning. We’ve already unpacked how the second ingredient listed is “Natural & Artificial Flavors,” which, under FDA loopholes, can legally contribute nitrogen to inflate protein numbers (21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i)). Without amino acid verification or third-party certification from Informed Protein, there’s no way to confirm that 2.523g of leucine is intact, bioavailable leucine, or just filler fluff.
Would I recommend Basic Supplements Whey Protein as your post-workout go-to? No. Based on the lack of testing and quality disclosures, you’d be better off sticking with high-protein whole foods. A study at the University of Minnesota Duluth found that a whole food diet can match or outperform whey supplements to support protein synthesis and hypertrophy.
If you’re still set on using this protein post-lift, here’s your play: go with two scoops of Basic Protein Powder. Or mix one scoop with a serving of high-protein skim milk, which gives you 13g protein and ~1.3g leucine according to USDA FoodData. Together, that combo might get you to the leucine threshold—assuming what’s on the tub is accurate.
Amino Spiking: 2.5 out of 10.
Basic Supplements Whey Protein hides behind label math, not muscle science. With no PDCAAS score, third-party amino testing, and “Natural & Artificial Flavors” listed second by weight, it’s impossible to trust that 25g claim. Under FDA loopholes, glutamine and glycine still count as protein—even if they don’t build muscle. This isn’t verified, whey—it’s a nitrogen-fluffed mystery blend.
🔑 Is Basic Supplements Whey Third-Party Tested? TL;DR
Before buying Basic Supplements Whey Protein, you should know that the brand claims third-party testing through Dyad Labs, an ISO 17025-accredited facility (PricePlow, 2024). But here’s the problem—Dyad Labs has appeared on multiple protein tubs I’ve reviewed before, and more often than not, those proteins were amino spiked.
So, is this testing legit… or just for show? Basic Supplements Protein leans heavily on the appearance of quality, dropping names like Provon and Avonlac—but skips transparency where it counts: no amino acid verification, no published toxicology report, and no PDCAAS scores. I even reached out to the company for official heavy metal test results. Still, no response. There is no customer service number. There is no way to verify the Prop 65 risk yourself.
Bottom line? Basic Protein Powder might be tested. But if it’s the same Dyad Labs rubber stamp used by other underperformers I’ve reviewed, then that “certified” label doesn’t mean what you think it does.
📜 Are Basic Supplements Whey Third-Party Tested?
Here’s what the label—and the marketing—want you to believe: Basic Supplements Whey Protein is third-party tested. And not just by anyone—by Dyad Labs, an ISO 17025-accredited facility. According to a PricePlow article, “Third-party testing means having an independent, unbiased laboratory analyze your products – in this case, Dyad Labs, an ISO 17025-accredited testing facility.”
Sounds solid on the surface. Except here’s the problem: every protein powder I’ve reviewed tied to Dyad Labs has had red flags—amino spiking, proprietary blends, label discrepancies. My full audit is here: JKremmerFitness.com – Dyad Labs protein powder reviews. At some point, coincidence stops being a coincidence and starts looking like a trend.
Basic Supplements Whey leans on Dyad’s name to suggest credibility. Still, the brand won’t release actual Certificates of Analysis, amino acid profiles, or toxicology reports—even when I reached out directly. There is no customer service phone number or direct support email.
So, is Basic Protein Powder really third-party tested in a way that protects you, the buyer? Or is it tested just enough to check a box?
⚠️ Heavy Metal Protein Powder: What’s Lurking in Your Scoop?
If you’re scooping Blue Marshmallow Basics Protein, thinking you’re safe because of the Provon and Avonlac name-drops—think again. Right on the label is a California Prop 65 warning, and that’s not just legal filler. This Basic Supplements Whey Protein contains detectable levels of heavy metals like lead, cadmium, or arsenic, above the state’s daily exposure limit. That’s not speculation. That’s on the tub.
And here’s where it gets worse. According to a Delish report, “chocolate-flavored protein powders had 65% exceeding Proposition 65 levels for heavy metals.” So, when you consider this same brand is offering Boston Cream Doughnut and Chocolate? Yeah, red flags are stacking up.

I did contact Basic Supplements directly, asking for a third-party toxicology or heavy metals report. Unfortunately, I haven’t received a response. Their website also doesn’t have a public-facing customer service phone number or email—just a form submission. That’s not transparency. That’s avoidance.
Basic Supplements wants the spotlight on its “Glanbia-powered” blend, but no mention of third-party testing, no COA, and no Informed Protein certification tells the real story. For a budget brand, they’re betting you’ll be too impressed with marketing buzzwords to question what’s inside the scoop.
And let’s be honest—if your protein comes with a state-mandated toxin warning, that’s not a premium. That’s a problem.
🔑 Protein Powder Comparison: Basic Supplements, TL;DR
When ranking these budget-friendly protein powders, you’re not just looking at flavor and macros—you’re looking at what’s hidden behind the label. And in this lineup, Basic Supplements Whey finishes dead last. Here’s the breakdown:
1. MyProtein Impact Whey
It’s the only one with an Informed Protein certification, which means the label’s protein yield and amino acid profile are verified. That puts it in a different tier, even if the brand doesn’t give you a leucine breakdown per flavor.
2. Dymatize Elite Whey
Yes, it uses natural and artificial flavors, but it tells you the blend is less than 2%, which is more transparency than most. It’s also Informed Choice certified, so you know it’s banned-substance tested. It’s not perfect, but honest.
3. ON Gold Standard Whey
Still one of the most recognized proteins globally, but Basic Supplements Whey does the same thing ON does—except ON doesn’t tell you how much flavoring is used, and it’s still hiding behind the same “natural and artificial” umbrella. No amino profile on the tub, and no Informed Protein certification.
4. Basic Supplements Whey
It tastes good. It lists Provon and Avonlac from Glanbia. However, using a Supplement Facts panel, a Prop 65 warning, and a higher price tag than the others takes it out of the running. This is still a budget whey protein supplement with bold claims, but you can get better—and cheaper—from literally every protein on this list.
Basic Supplements Whey isn’t the smart play if you buy on a budget.
📊 Protein Powder Comparison: Basic Supplements
This comparison puts Basics Protein Powder against three of the most recognized names in the whey protein space: ON Gold Standard, Dymatize Elite Whey, and MyProtein Impact Whey. Each of these proteins has a reputation earned through certifications, consistent label transparency, and years of customer feedback that isn’t just stuffed with Vine freebies and anonymous praise.
ON Gold Standard is the default for a reason. It’s globally recognized and uses a Nutrition Facts panel. While it doesn’t list a full amino acid breakdown on the bag, a complete profile is available on the company’s website. It also carries the Informed Choice badge—just remember that it verifies banned substance testing, not protein integrity. Still, ON’s consistent formulation, reliable scoop yield, and zero Prop 65 warning put it in a different tier than Basics Protein Powder.
Dymatize Elite Whey is known for its value, but not at the expense of quality. It’s also Informed Choice certified, with a cleaner label than most proteins in its price range. The natural and artificial flavoring is disclosed at less than 2%, and it doesn’t play games with scoop size or yield. While a full review is still in progress, it outpaces Basics Protein Powder in terms of transparency.
MyProtein Impact Whey is the wildcard—Informed Protein certified, meaning its protein yield and amino acid content are verified for accuracy. You won’t get every ratio or leucine number by flavor, but that certification means more than anything Basics offers. The brand shares amino profiles online and doesn’t hide behind Supplement Facts.
So when you compare Basics Protein Powder to these three, the question isn’t whether it holds up—it’s whether it even belongs on the same shelf.
🆚 Whey Protein Powder Comparison: Basic Supplements Whey vs Optimum Nutrition ON Gold Standard
When comparing Basic Supplements Whey Gold Standard vs. Optimum Nutrition ON, you’re looking at two whey blends with very different transparency standards. One relies on long-standing trust and manufacturing consistency—ON Gold Standard. The other—Basic Supplements Whey—leans into macros and buzzwords without offering much brand credibility.
Basic Supplements Whey uses a Supplement Facts panel, which legally allows more ambiguity in protein sourcing. While it claims to use Provon and Avonlac (from Glanbia), the isolate-to-concentrate ratio is not disclosed. Even though a full amino acid profile is printed on the container and Dyad Labs is listed as the third-party lab, that doesn’t eliminate the risk of label manipulation, especially when many budget brands use the same tactic and still underdose or spike.
In contrast, ON Gold Standard uses a Nutrition Facts panel and carries the Informed Choice certification—but it’s worth clarifying that the certification screens for banned substances, not protein integrity. Still, ON’s track record is far stronger, and its label shows natural and artificial flavoring near the bottom of the ingredient list, not second, like Basic.
| Basic Supplements Whey vs ON Gold Standard: Nutrition, Amino Acids, and Price Breakdown | |||
| Key Differences & Comparison Metrics | Basic Supplements Whey Vanilla | ON Gold Standard Vanilla Ice Cream | %DV |
| Leucine (g) | 2.5g | 2.6g | — |
| Leucine Percent (%) | 10.00% | 10.83% | — |
| Total BCAAs (g) | 5.4g | 5.5g | — |
| Protein per Serving (g) | 25g | 24g | 48% – 50% |
| Carbs per Serving (g) | 4g | 4g | 1% |
| Fiber per Serving (g) | 0g | 0g | 0% |
| Total Sugars (g) | 3g | 1g | — |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 120 kcal | — |
| Serving Size (g) | 34g | 31g | — |
| Number of Servings | 26 | 29 | — |
| Amazon Price(June 2025) | $39.99 | $38.32 | — |
| Price per Serving | $1.54 | $1.32 | — |
Bottom Line: Regarding price per serving, ON Gold Standard also comes ahead while maintaining flavor consistency and consumer trust.
For a full analysis of ON’s labeling, ingredient integrity, and macro yield, see the full ON Gold Standard protein review. If you’re ready to test it, here’s the Amazon listing for ON Gold Standard.
🆚 Whey Protein Powder Comparison: Basic Supplements Protein vs Whey Dymatize Elite
Regarding Basic Supplements Protein vs. Whey Dymatize Elite, both brands aim for value, but the execution is very different.
Basic Supplements Protein is marketed as a clean-label whey protein supplement with Glanbia-sourced WPI and WPC. It does include a full amino acid profile printed on the label and cites Dyad Labs as the testing partner. However, this is still a Supplement Facts panel product flavored with natural and artificial ingredients listed second, and it carries a Prop 65 warning—something Dymatize avoids entirely.
Whey Dymatize Elite offers 25g of protein per serving with a nearly identical BCAA profile, but under a Nutrition Facts panel with a tighter ingredient list. It also discloses that the flavor blend (natural and artificial) is used at less than 2%, which is far more transparent than Basic’s label. Dymatize is Informed Choice certified, but again, that verifies banned substance testing, not amino integrity or yield.
The price gap is also real. As of June 2025, Dymatize costs nearly 25% less per serving, has comparable macros, and has better labeling transparency.
| Label Transparency Showdown: Basic Supplements Protein vs Whey Dymatize Elite | |||
| Key Differences & Comparison Metrics | Basic Supplements Whey Vanilla | Whey Dymatize Elite Vanilla | %DV |
| Leucine | 2.5g | 2.7g | — |
| Leucine Percent | 10.00% | 10.08% | — |
| Total BCAAs | 5.4g | 5.5g | — |
| Protein per Serving | 25g | 25g | 50% |
| Carbs per Serving | 4g | 2g | 1% |
| Fiber per Serving | 0g | 0g | 0% |
| Total Sugars | 3g | 2g | — |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 140 kcal | — |
| Serving Size | 34g | 34g | — |
| Number of Servings | 26 | 26 | — |
| Amazon Price(June 2025) | $39.99 | $30.68 | — |
| Price per Serving | $1.54 | $1.18 | — |
Bottom Lin: In the matchup between Basic Supplements Protein vs Whey Dymatize Elite, Dymatize wins on price, label formatting, and flavor dose disclosure. Basic Whey offers a printed amino panel but hides behind Supplement Facts and flavor-heavy formulations.
Want more details on Dymatize? A full review is in progress. For now, you can buy Whey Dymatize Elite here.
🆚 Whey Protein Powder Comparison: Basic Supplements Whey Protein vs MyProtein Impact Whey Protein
In the matchup of Basic Supplements Whey Protein vs. MyProtein Impact Whey Protein, both brands promote budget-level pricing, but only one delivers verified protein integrity.
Basic Supplements Whey Protein includes a printed amino acid profile and is named Dyad Labs as its third-party testing lab. But don’t let the label fool you. It uses a Supplement Facts panel, allowing flexible protein blending and omitting %DV for protein. Natural and artificial flavors are listed second, and a Prop 65 warning sits quietly on the back. While it lists Glanbia-sourced protein (Provon and Avonlac), there’s no breakdown of how much each is used.
On the other hand, MyProtein Impact Whey Protein is Informed Protein certified, which verifies actual protein yield and label integrity. While it doesn’t share a full leucine breakdown, the certification places it in a different class. It also uses a Nutrition Facts panel and has a cleaner ingredient list.
Yes, you’re getting less protein per scoop (22g vs 25g), but MyProtein gives you more servings per tub and a cleaner label overall.
| Truth vs Trust: Basic Supplements Whey Protein vs MyProtein Impact Whey Breakdown | |||
| Key Differences & Comparison Metrics | Basic Supplements Whey Vanilla | MyProtein Impact Whey Protein Vanilla | %DV |
| Leucine | 2.5g | Informed Protein Verified | — |
| Leucine Percent | 10.00% | Requested, Won’t Share | — |
| Total BCAAs | 5.4g | 5.0g | — |
| Protein per Serving | 25g | 22g | 44% |
| Carbs per Serving | 4g | 3g | |
| Fiber per Serving | 0g | 0g | |
| Total Sugars | 3g | 1g | — |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 120 kcal | — |
| Serving Size | 34g | 30g | — |
| Number of Servings | 26 | 32 | — |
| Amazon Price(As of ) | $39.99 | $34.99 | — |
| Price per Serving | $1.54 | $1.87 | — |
Between Basic Supplements Whey Protein vs MyProtein Impact Whey Protein, MyProtein is better for those who care about verified quality and label transparency. A full MyProtein review is coming soon, but if you’re ready to compare for yourself, buy MyProtein Impact Whey Protein on Amazon.
⭐️ Amazon Whey Protein Review: Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review
Let’s not pretend this is some grassroots hit. When writing this Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review, it has a 4.7-star average based on just 5 reviews. Five. And of course, every single one is glowing. You’d think Basic Supplements Whey Protein was a medical breakthrough, not a budget whey protein supplement loaded with natural and artificial flavors and slapped with a Prop 65 warning.
Let’s dig into the fan fiction.
“Tastes great! No chalky texture or weird aftertaste like some other protein powders. It is also a little cheaper on Amazon vs my local GNC. Very happy!”
Cool. I also bought my container from Amazon because shipping is cheaper than Basic’s site or GNC. That’s about the only real win.
Then we’ve got the Amazon Vine crew—they got it for free.
“This protein checks all the boxes… 77% protein by calories… no mess… no strange aftertastes.”
Actually, it doesn’t mix without a blender. This stuff clumps. And while 77% protein-by-calories is decent for a budget whey protein blend, you don’t know what ratio of Provon to Avonlac you’re getting—if that’s even what’s in there. Funny how nobody mentions the Prop 65 warning.
“…mixed thoroughly with just a simple spoon stirring…”
C’mon. Be honest. It clumps. The Blue Marshmallow flavor is surprisingly solid; I’ll give them that. How many of these Vine reviewers even lift it?
The consensus on Amazon regarding Basic Supplements Whey Protein Review is that it’s all hype and not scrutinized. My take? It’s a flavored mystery blend sold through well-worded testimonials.
What You’re Really Getting with Basic Supplements Whey (Hint: It’s Not Premium Protein)
Summary
You might think this Blue Marshmallow tub screams quality, but dig past the label, and the Basic Supplements Review tells a different story. It’s pitched as high-end whey using Provon and Avonlac, but skips key disclosures like %DV, PDCAAS, and amino validation. Flavor? Cotton candy nostalgia. But transparency? Missing. With “Natural u0026amp; Artificial Flavors” listed second and a Prop 65 warning slapped on the side, this isn’t built for serious lifters but for label aesthetics. If you’re chasing results, not rainbow sprinkles, look elsewhere.
Pros
- Fun novelty flavor
Cons
- Proprietary protein blend
- Possible amino spiking
- Prop 65 warning present
- Poor customer support
🥤 What’s The Best Way To Mix Basic Supplements Protein Powder
The tub says, “1 scoop into 6–16 ounces of water, then shake.” Sounds easy enough. But here’s the truth about mixing Basic Supplements Whey Protein: you’re not getting smooth, you’re getting sabotage.
After a 10-second shake, the shaker wall gets smothered by thick clumps that cling like they’re on a mission. They’re under the lid, in the drink, and everywhere. That’s classic budget-protein behavior, and it usually points to cheap filtration, not high-quality Provon and Avonlac doing the heavy lifting. Basic Protein Powder delivers a dollar-store mixing experience for a mid-tier price tag.
⚖️ Does Basic Supplements Protein Powder Come With A Scoop?
👌 Does Basic Supplements Blue Marshmallow Taste Good?
Open the tub and you’re immediately hit with a puff of cotton candy mist—nostril foreplay, no doubt. Basic Supplements Blue Marshmallow leans hard into the sweet side, like sipping melted fairground fluff without the grit of real sugar. It’s a novelty flavor through and through—smooth, velvety, and almost milkshake-lite in body. If you’ve got a sweet tooth, this Basic Protein Powder might hit just right—but if you’re sweetness-sensitive, it could feel like you’re on a sugar rush.
Mixability: 7.0 out of 10.
While Basic Supplements Protein Powder doesn’t require a blender, it doesn’t behave exactly. After a quick 10-second shake, stubborn clumps grip the shaker wall and under the lid and float in your drink like uninvited guests. It’s not insoluble, but you’d expect better solubility for a protein in this price tier. If you can tolerate a bit of chunk, it’s passable—just don’t expect a smooth pour every time.
🔑 Basic Supplements Whey Protein Ingredients List, TL;DR
Here’s the quick scoop on Basic Supplements Whey Protein: it looks premium on the outside, but the ingredient list tells a different story. The protein blend name-drops Glanbia’s Provon and Avonlac, but there’s zero breakdown of how much you’re getting. Natural and artificial flavors are listed second by weight, right behind the protein itself, which opens the door for amino spiking via FDA loopholes. If you’re buying Basics Protein Powder thinking it’s clean or transparent, look again: this is a budget blend with a high risk of label inflation and filler masking.
📋 Basic Supplements Whey Protein Ingredients List
Let’s peel back the label and look at what’s inside this Blue Marshmallow Basic Protein Powder scoop. If you thought this was just some clean, premium whey—spoiler alert—it’s not. This budget-tier blend hides behind good branding and some expensive-sounding protein names.
At the top, we’ve got a whey blend of concentrate, isolate, and hydrolysate. The brand name-drops Provon and Avonlac—two proprietary proteins from Glanbia—but they don’t disclose the ratio. So is it mostly concentrate with a sprinkle of isolate? No clue. That’s the issue.
| Basic Supplements Whey Blue Marshmallow: Ingredient List Breakdown | |
| Ingredient | Purpose |
| Whey Blend (Concentrate, Isolate, Whey Protein Hydroslate) | Main protein source blend; uses proprietary Glanbia proteins (Provon and Avonlac), but the ratio is not disclosed. |
| Natural & Artificial Flavors | Enhance flavor or a potential FDA loophole for nitrogen filler |
| Soy Lecithin | Emulsifier |
| Salt | Flavoring |
| Cellulose Gum | Thickener |
| Xanthan Gum | Stabilizer |
| Carrageenan | Gelling agent contributes to creamy texture and consistency. |
| Sucralose | Zero-calorie artificial sweetener |
| Acesulfame Potassium | Zero-calorie artificial sweetener |
| Spirulina Extract | Natural colorant gives the “blue” visual effect of the Blue Marshmallow flavor. |
Then come the natural and artificial flavors, which are listed second, ahead of salt and sweeteners. That’s a huge red flag. Under FDA Supplement Facts loopholes, these ingredients can legally be used to spike nitrogen levels and still count toward protein total. Translation? You could get less intact whey protein and more glutamine or filler masquerading as protein.
Sucralose and Acesulfame Potassium round out the sweeteners—no surprise for this sweet powder. And yeah, it tastes good. But that doesn’t make Basic Protein Powder clean, high-quality, or trustworthy.
For anyone thinking this could compete with the big dogs—check the label, check the math, and check your expectations. There’s a reason this blend costs less. It’s not just the price you’re paying, but the corners being cut.
⚠️ Natural & Artificial Flavors in Basic Supplements Whey: Spiking Loophole or Legit Flavoring?

Let’s examine one of the biggest red flags on the Basic Supplements Whey label: natural and artificial flavors appear second by weight, right after the protein blend. That’s not a minor detail.
According to the FDA’s Title 21 regulations, “ingredients required to be declared on the label… shall be listed in descending order of predominance by weight” 21 CFR § 101.4(a)(1). So when Basic Supplements Protein puts flavoring above salt, lecithin, and sweeteners, we know it’s not a pinch. It’s a chunk of the formula.
Why does this matter? Because under the Supplement Facts format, there’s no requirement to disclose whether these “flavors” include nitrogen-based amino fillers like glutamine or glycine, which can artificially inflate total protein content. Brands legally count nitrogen toward total protein if they don’t provide a quality evaluation like PDCAAS 21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i).
Basic Protein lists a “whey blend” (concentrate, isolate, hydrolysate), but gives zero breakdown of how much of each you’re getting. Pair that with second-by-weight flavoring and no third-party amino acid verification? That’s not clean protein—it’s a formulation built on flavor masking and loophole math.
Until Basic Supplements Whey Protein publishes PDCAAS scores or earns Informed Protein certification, that flavor listing isn’t just about taste. It’s a potential marker for spiking, hidden behind regulatory wiggle room.
🥼 What Kind of Protein Does Basic Supplements Whey Protein Have?
Basic Supplements Whey Protein claims to use Provon and Avonlac, two proprietary whey proteins from Glanbia Nutritionals. Sounds impressive. It would be great to know how much of either is in the tub.
Provon 290 is a high-purity whey protein isolate. It’s microfiltered, contains minimal fat or lactose, and is often used in premium products due to its high solubility and neutral taste. Avonlac 282 is a whey protein concentrate (WPC80) known for balancing functionality and protein content, usually around 80% protein by weight. Both are top-tier ingredients on paper, but what percentage of Basics Protein Powder includes them again?
We don’t know. And the label doesn’t tell us. Believe me, I contacted Basic Supplements with my normal protein review questions.
That’s the game with “proprietary blends.” You list the best ingredients up front, then bury them under a vague flavoring system that could contain more nitrogen-boosting filler than actual isolate. And remember: this is a product that comes with a California Prop 65 warning. So, how much Provon and Avonlac are we getting before the contamination, gums, and blue marshmallow flavoring take over?
Glanbia might be the best in the game—“Optimum Nutrition remains the number one sports nutrition brand globally as of 2023” (Glanbia Annual Report 2023, p. 12)—but Basic Supplements Whey Protein isn’t Optimum Nutrition. It’s a blend and likely a small scoop of quality protein diluted by cheaper inputs.
So, what kind of protein does Basic Supplements Whey Protein have? Maybe 5% Provon, 5% Avonlac… and 90% mystery.

Ingredients List: 3.5 out of 10.
Basic Supplements Whey Protein uses Glanbia’s Provon and Avonlac, which are great on paper, but the label gives zero clue how much you’re getting. “Natural & artificial flavors” are listed second by weight, which opens the door wide for amino fillers and label inflation. There’s no digestive support, absorption aid, or ingredient transparency beyond name-drops. For a product pushing clean macros, this is a flavored formula hiding behind flavoring.
🔑 Basic Supplements Whey: Supplement Facts, Macros, and Label Red Flags, TL;DR
Here’s what stands out after a quick scan of the label—and what should make you pause before scooping.
Basic Supplements Whey Protein doesn’t just lean into the Supplement Facts format—it hides in it. No %DV for protein. No breakdown of the whey blend. Natural and artificial flavors are listed second, ahead of salt or sweeteners. That’s not by accident. It’s a textbook case of FDA label compliance used to distract from real transparency.
The tub claims 25g of protein per serving, technically delivering that. But you’re left guessing with no PDCAAS score, third-party amino certification, or indication of how much Provon or Avonlac is in each scoop.
Even the macros—130 calories, 4g carbs, 1.5g fat—are textbook for a budget whey protein powder. But if you’re buying this thinking you’re getting a clean, premium protein, think again. Basics assumes you won’t ask questions beyond the front label.
Basic Supplements Whey Protein checks the boxes: branded protein, printed amino profile, competitive macros. But look closer, and it’s a blend of unknown ratios, no absorption aids, and labeling that avoids actual accountability.
Bottom line: Basic Supplements Whey Protein is a macro-friendly disguise for a supplement that’s more marketing than muscle.
🥗 Basic Supplements Whey: Supplement Facts, Macros, and Label Red Flags
Let’s break down the Basics of the Protein label—not just what’s on it, but what’s missing. This isn’t just a glance at macros; it’s about understanding how Basics Protein positions itself on the shelf using FDA labeling loopholes most people never see.
The tub shows a Supplement Facts panel, not Nutrition Facts—red flag #1. That format gives the basic supplements brand more room to hide behind blended ingredient listings and omit details like the %DV for protein. This matters when you’re trying to assess actual protein quality.
According to the label, you’re getting:
- 130 calories, 25g protein, and 4g carbs per 33.5g scoop
- 3g of sugar, but no added sugar disclosure
- Sodium and potassium levels are in line with a standard whey protein supplement
| Basic Supplements Whey Blue Marshmallow: Full Nutrition Breakdown | ||
| Nutrients | Amount per Serving (33.5g) | % Daily Value (%DV) |
| Calories | 130 kcal | — |
| Total Fat | 1.5g | 2% |
| Sodium (mg) | 115mg | 5% |
| Total Carbohydrates (g) | 4g | 1% |
| Dietary Fiber (g) | 0g | 0% |
| Total Sugars (g) | 3g | — |
| Protein (g) | 25g | Not Listed |
| Leucine | 2.523g | — |
| Total BCAAs | 5.397g | — |
| Calcium | 135mg | 11% |
| Potassium | 179mg | 4% |
But here’s what stands out:
- Protein is listed as a “whey blend”—no percentage breakdown of WPC vs WPI vs hydrolyzed
- Natural and artificial flavors are listed second, ahead of salt or sweeteners
- No mention of digestive enzymes, absorption aids, or PDCAAS
Sure, the label says 25g protein, and the Basics Protein amino acid profile is printed on the tub—but without Informed Protein certification, you’re taking the brand’s word for it. That might be fine for a budget whey protein supplement, but you should know what you’re getting.
Next, we will discuss the difference between Supplement Facts and Nutrition Facts and how the basic supplements brand uses formatting to its advantage.
⚖️ Supplement Facts vs Nutrition Facts: How the Basic Supplements Brand Uses the Loophole

Most consumers don’t realize how much label freedom comes with using a Supplement Facts panel instead of a Nutrition Facts label—and the Basic Supplements Brand leans into that loophole hard.
Under 21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i), the FDA allows protein to be listed without a %DV if the brand doesn’t evaluate quality using a method like PDCAAS. Here’s the exact line:
“Percent of Daily Value for protein is not required unless a protein claim is made or the product is represented for use by infants or children under four years of age.”
So, what does this mean for the Basic Supplements Brand?
- Protein is listed as a “whey blend,” but there’s a zero percentage breakdown of how much WPC, WPI, or hydrolyzed is. That lack of disclosure allows them to lean on brands like Provon and Avonlac without proving how much you’re getting.
- Natural and artificial flavors are listed second, ahead of salt or sweeteners. That’s more than a flavor cue—it could be a nitrogen source. Under Supplement Facts, these could count toward total protein, even if they’re not high-quality dietary protein.
- No digestive enzymes, no PDCAAS testing, and no %DV listed. That’s not illegal—but it’s a red flag. Other brands using Nutrition Facts also leave %DV blank, but they’re not hiding behind proprietary flavor blends or contamination disclaimers.
The Basic Supplements Brand has built a compliant label, but behind the clean font is an open-ended formula built on marketing smoke and amino shadows.
🍗 How Much Real Protein Are You Getting? Basics Protein Yield Per Serving Breakdown
This is the section where we remove the label goggles and do the math. Basics Protein claims to give you 25g of protein per serving. Great. But the picture starts to shift when you break that out by scoop size, which is not in Basics’ favor.
As discussed in the FDA loophole section, protein brands like the Basic Supplements brand love using the Supplement Facts label. Why? Because it lets them skirt PDCAAS testing, avoid disclosing the %DV for protein, and still legally inflate numbers using additives that fall under the “protein” umbrella. Basics Protein lists a whey blend with no breakdown of WPC vs. WPI vs. hydrolyzed whey, and they toss in Natural and Artificial Flavors as the second most dominant ingredient by weight. That’s not flavoring—that’s masking.
Technically, 25g out of 34g is 74% protein. But what if half of that is glutamine or other nitrogen-based fillers? The FDA’s guidance (21 CFR § 101.36(b)(2)(i)) allows for this kind of labeling as long as total nitrogen matches the protein claim. So the math checks out, even if the quality doesn’t.
And let’s not ignore the Glanbia name-drop. Basics Protein claims to use Provon and Avonlac, but no flavor list lists how much each is used. Are we getting 5% isolate and 95% flavor dust? Who knows?
Bottom line? Basics Protein looks great on the surface, but once you calculate the real yield and consider the lack of quality disclosures, this budget blend starts looking more like a budget bluff.
| Flavor | Protein per Serving (g) | Scoop Size (g) | Protein Percentage (%) |
| Basic Supplements Whey Blue Marshmallow | 25g | 33.5g | 75% |
| Boston Cream Doughnut | 25g | 35g | 71% |
| Chocolate | 25g | 35g | 71% |
| Vanilla | 25g | 34g | 74% |
| Average Protein Percent Across All Basic Supplements Protein Flavors: 74% | |||
Nutrition Facts: 3.5 out of 10.
Basic Supplements Whey Protein earns a 3.5 out of 10 because it hides behind a Supplement Facts panel, skipping %DV and avoiding validated quality testing like PDCAAS. It lists “whey protein blend” with no breakdown of WPC vs WPI vs hydrolyzed whey—just name-drops like Provon and Avonlac. Natural and artificial flavors appear second on the label, opening the door to amino spiking through nitrogen-based fillers. No enzymes, no absorption aids, no third-party verification—just loopholes dressed as macros.
📋 Basic Supplements FAQ
No. Despite the website listing Informed Choice and NSF-certified facilities, Basic Supplements Protein does not carry an NSF certification seal. It’s a borrowed claim based on manufacturer credentials, not product verification.
Potentially. Basic Supplements Whey Protein is made with Avonlac concentrate and Provon isolate from Glanbia. While Provon is low-lactose, Avonlac can still trigger GI discomfort in sensitive users. No digestive enzymes are included, and the brand offers zero insight into FODMAP levels or GI tolerance testing.
No. Because it uses a blend of whey protein concentrate and isolate, Basic Supplements Whey is not lactose-free. And there’s no “lactose-free” claim on the label. If you’re lactose sensitive, skip it.
Technically yes—but there’s no third-party gluten-free certification or statement anywhere on the packaging or site. If you have Celiac disease, don’t assume this is safe.
According to the brand, Basic Supplements Protein Powder is made in the USA. However, exact facility details are hidden behind manufacturing partner claims.
Yes. The Blue Marshmallow flavor uses sucralose (an artificial sweetener) and “Natural & Artificial Flavors,” listed second by weight, ahead of salt. This is textbook marketing fluff masking label inflation.
There are red flags. The label lists flavors before salt or sweeteners, which opens the door to glycine or glutamine padding under FDA loopholes (21 CFR § 101.36). Basic Supplements Whey walks right into the amino spiking category without a certified amino acid profile.
Sure—but understand what you’re getting. There’s no thermogenic support, no appetite control ingredients, and nothing about this formula is tailored for fat loss. At best, Basic Supplements Protein is a sweet-tasting protein bump. But weight loss? That’s diet and deficit, not a scoop of Blue Marshmallow.
One scoop gives you 25g of protein and ~2.5g of leucine, brushing the threshold for MPS (muscle protein synthesis). But if you question label integrity, two scoops or one scoop + 13g protein from skim milk is your best bet to ensure full anabolic signaling.
It depends on your definition of good. They say, “We don’t cut corners, ” highlighting Glanbia proteins and vertical integration, skipping third-party amino testing, and not disclosing protein quality scores (PDCAAS). Knock yourself out if you’re into novelty flavors and branding over bioavailability. But if you care about verified quality, this isn’t it.
Technically? Yeah. The Blue Marshmallow flavor of Basic Supplements Whey is gluten-free by formulation. But before you fist-pump into a protein shake, know this—it’s manufactured in a facility that also processes wheat, soy, and other allergens. That means cross-contamination is on the table, especially since there’s no third-party gluten-free certification anywhere on the site or label.
And yes—it does contain milk and soy (via soy lecithin), which matters if you’re managing gut issues, food intolerances, or autoimmune conditions. So if you’re celiac or even moderately sensitive, you’ll want to skip this one or get written confirmation from the brand, which, by the way, still hasn’t answered my email.
🏁 Basic Supplements Whey Review – Final Thoughts
Before you toss Basic Supplements Whey Protein into your cart because the branding looks clean and the flavor sounds fun, here are three things you need to know:
1. “We don’t cut corners” is printed on their Our Story page, but their execution says otherwise. There’s no PDCAAS score, no %DV for protein, and zero disclosure on how much Provon or Avonlac you’re actually getting. What do they list second by weight? “Natural & Artificial Flavors”—a red flag for potential amino spiking hidden behind FDA labeling loopholes (21 CFR § 101.36).
2. You’re paying mid-tier pricing for budget-tier transparency. This isn’t just about label math—it’s about trust. A 25g protein claim with no amino acid verification, a Prop 65 warning, and no response to my toxicology report request make the brand feel more concerned with perception than performance. If they had nothing to hide, they’d publish the report.
3. The refund policy hides contact info. It covers unopened products within 30 days, but only if you ask first. There is no direct line, chat support, or posted phone number. Just a quiet email form and a “we’ll get back to you,” which they didn’t.
Basic Supplements Protein is marketed with buzzwords and sleek packaging. But when you dig into the label, test the mixability, and audit the quality? The real “basic” here isn’t the formula—it’s the effort.

✅ Is Basic Supplements Whey Good?
If you go by marketing, Basic Supplements Whey Protein is the clean, performance-driven fuel every gym-goer’s been waiting for. But let’s cut through the hype. This is a protein powder with no PDCAAS, no %DV for protein, and a Prop 65 warning on the pouch. The ingredient list lists “Natural & Artificial Flavors” second by weight, a textbook nitrogen-padding move. They name-drop Provon and Avonlac to boost perceived value—but don’t disclose ratios, batch testing, or amino verification. And when I reached out for clarification, customer service ghosted me.
This isn’t a bad option if you’re chasing novelty flavors like Blue Marshmallow and don’t care much about label integrity or verified protein quality. But suppose you’re trying to build muscle, retain lean mass, or cut fat on a calorie deficit. You need a protein powder with real digestibility metrics, intact amino acids, and better transparency.
After a full breakdown of sourcing, label claims, potential amino spiking, and poor customer support, it lands at 16.5 out of 50, or 33%. Fails to Deliver.
Are you looking for more protein reviews? Here are all of JKremmer Fitness unbiased protein powder reviews. Are you looking for a protein review that I haven’t done yet? Email me at my ‘Contact Me’ page, and I’ll do my best to get an unbiased review out in 4 weeks.
What You’re Really Getting with Basic Supplements Whey (Hint: It’s Not Premium Protein)
Summary
You might think this Blue Marshmallow tub screams quality, but dig past the label, and the Basic Supplements Review tells a different story. It’s pitched as high-end whey using Provon and Avonlac, but skips key disclosures like %DV, PDCAAS, and amino validation. Flavor? Cotton candy nostalgia. But transparency? Missing. With “Natural u0026amp; Artificial Flavors” listed second and a Prop 65 warning slapped on the side, this isn’t built for serious lifters but for label aesthetics. If you’re chasing results, not rainbow sprinkles, look elsewhere.
Pros
- Fun novelty flavor
Cons
- Proprietary protein blend
- Possible amino spiking
- Prop 65 warning present
- Poor customer support
🧐 Basic Supplements Whey Review Round-Up
| Category | Score |
| Value | 0.0 out of 10 |
| Amino Spiking | 2.5 out of 10 |
| Mixability | 7.0 out of 10 |
| Ingredient List | 3.5 out of 10 |
| Nutrition Facts | 3.5 out of 10 |
| Overall Score | 16.5/50, 33%, Fails to Deliver |
📑 Basic Supplements Whey Review Sources
21 CFR 101.4 — Food; designation of ingredients. (n.d.). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-A/section-101.4
21 CFR 101.36 — Nutrition labeling of dietary supplements. (n.d.). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-A/section-101.36
21 CFR Part 101 — Food labeling. (n.d.). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101#101.36
Basic Supplements. (n.d.-a). Our story | Basic Supplements. https://basicsupplements.com/pages/our-story
Basic Supplements. (n.d.-b). Refund policy. https://basicsupplements.com/policies/refund-policy
Basic Supplements. (n.d.-c). Trust in science & quality for better health | Basic Supplements. https://basicsupplements.com/pages/science-quality
Dimke, D., Ventrella, M., & Wilcox, S. (2014). The effects of whey supplementation and natural diet on protein synthesis and muscle hypertrophy. https://cehsp.d.umn.edu/sites/cehsp.d.umn.edu/files/2the_effects_of_whey_supplementation_and_natural_diet_on_protein_synthesis_and_muscle_hypertrophy.pdf
Glanbia plc. (2023). Annual Report and Financial Statements 2023. https://www.glanbia.com/sites/glanbia-plc/files/glanbia/investors/annual-report/2024/annual-report-2023.pdf
Gorissen, S. H. M., Crombag, J. J. R., Senden, J. M. G., Waterval, W. a. H., Bierau, J., Verdijk, L. B., & Van Loon, L. J. C. (2018). Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. Amino Acids, 50(12), 1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2640-5
Mactas, A. (2025, January 23). Toxins found in Protein Powder—What experts want you to know before making another shake. Delish. https://www.delish.com/food/a63455559/toxins-found-in-protein-powder-is-it-safe-to-eat-experts/
Nutritionals, G. (2025, February 18). Provon® – Ultra pure whey protein isolate (WPI) to fuel the body’s engine. Glanbia Nutritionals. https://www.glanbianutritionals.com/en/nutri-knowledge-center/nutritional-resources/provon-whey-protein-isolate-best-fuel-your-bodys
Glanbia Nutritionals. (n.d.). Avonlac® 282. UL Prospector. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.ulprospector.com/en/na/Food/Detail/3686/361198/Avonlac-282
Schaafsma, G. (2000). The Protein Digestibility–Corrected Amino Acid Score. Journal of Nutrition, 130(7), 1865S-1867S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.7.1865s
Staff, P. (2025, March 31). Basic supplements proves their quality: lab test results reveal. . . The PricePlow Blog. https://blog.priceplow.com/supplement-news/basic-supplements-lab-tests
Stark, M., Lukaszuk, J., Prawitz, A., & Salacinski, A. (2012). Protein timing and its effects on muscular hypertrophy and strength in individuals engaged in weight-training. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-9-54
USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Legacy. (2018). Nutrient content in household measure. https://www.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/files/page-files/leucine.pdf




Leave a Reply